It’s hard to watch a once-proud program fade into mediocrity, but that’s exactly what’s happening at Florida State. The Seminoles’ eighth straight ACC loss on Saturday wasn’t just a defeat—it was a symptom of a deeper issue. Pitt’s 34-31 victory wasn’t just a game; it was a stark reminder that Mike Norvell’s tenure, now at a tepid 36-30 record, is teetering on the edge of irrelevance. And this is the part most people miss: it’s not just about the losses; it’s about the how and why behind them.
The game itself was a rollercoaster of missed opportunities and uninspired play. Florida State started strong, taking a 21-14 lead into halftime, but their second-half performance was a masterclass in apathy. Pitt, on the other hand, came out aggressive, converting three fourth-down attempts on their opening drive—a bold statement that set the tone for the rest of the game. But here’s where it gets controversial: was FSU’s collapse a result of poor coaching, player execution, or a combination of both? Norvell’s strategy, particularly in critical moments, has fans and analysts alike scratching their heads.
The Seminoles briefly found their rhythm in the second quarter, intercepting Pitt’s true freshman quarterback Mason Heintschel twice and scoring two touchdowns to take the lead. But their inability to sustain momentum in the second half was baffling. A quick three-and-out to start the third quarter handed Pitt the ball, and the Panthers capitalized with an 85-yard drive to tie the game. FSU’s reliance on their run game, despite being down multiple receivers, felt like a desperate attempt to control the clock—a strategy that backfired spectacularly after a costly fumble by Holmes.
Pitt’s resilience was on full display, as they repeatedly exploited FSU’s defensive weaknesses. A 35-yard completion late in the game pushed them deep into Seminole territory, though they settled for a field goal to tie it up. FSU’s offense, however, continued to sputter, with back-to-back three-and-outs giving Pitt ample opportunities to take control. The Panthers’ game-winning touchdown with 2:28 left felt almost inevitable, and FSU’s late rally—a single touchdown—was too little, too late. The failed onside kick sealed their fate, leaving fans wondering: How much longer can this go on?
Statistically, the game was a near mirror image, with both teams trading blows in nearly every category. FSU edged out Pitt in rushing yards (170 to 155), but the Panthers dominated in passing (321 to 245) and time of possession (32:35 to 27:25). Turnovers proved costly for both sides, but Pitt’s ability to convert in the red zone (5-6 compared to FSU’s 2-2) was the difference-maker. And this raises a thought-provoking question: Is FSU’s problem talent, tactics, or something deeper?
As the Seminoles limp through another disappointing season, one thing is clear: change is needed. But what form should that change take? Should Norvell be given more time, or is it time for Florida State to look elsewhere? Let’s hear your thoughts in the comments—do you think Norvell can turn this around, or is it time for a fresh start?
